Not the Bees
  • Buzz
  • Reel
  • Stand-Up
  • The Cage Cage
  • About Us
    • Theme Song
    • Contributors
    Shutter Island 2.18.10 02/19/2010
    8 Comments
     
    Picture
    Reviewed By: Riley Beam

    “Remember us - for we too have lived, loved and laughed.”

     As a plaque in front of the asylum suggests, Shutter Island is not the same world we live in, although there are remnants of it that continue to float around. The experience created by Martin Scorsese in his latest film is one that tests the audience's detective skills and sanity.  But the real fun doesn't begin until after the credits roll and one questions what actually just happened.

    Teddy Daniels and Chuck Aule are U.S. Marshalls assigned to investigate a missing patient at Ashecliffe Hospital for the Criminally Insane. The hospital is located on Shutter Island, a solitary locale where rumor has it, there is no way off the island. Ben Kingsley plays the lead psychiatrist with a smile that can't be trusted, and he does his best to divert Teddy and Chuck's investigation. During the search, Teddy struggles with his past life, haunted by the death of his wife and the story of the missing patient.  This leads Teddy down a dangerous path where, like every other mystery movie ever made, nothing is what it seems and no one can be trusted.

    Shutter Island takes place in the 1950's, when psychiatry tiptoed the line of barbaric and cutting-edge, and a doctor's work was all experimental; which sounds a lot like modern day psychiatry. Adding further depth to the complicated plot are themes relating to the Holocaust, life in the 1950's, and a bad, bad storm.  If not for these intertwined story-lines Scorsese's film would have just been a run of the mill thriller.

    Despite what some may think of the plot and dialogue, the imagery is really what makes Shutter Island stand out.  Water, fire, blood, wind, and ice all float across the screen to create dramatic shots that remain imprinted in the mind well past the end of the movie. Graphic dream-like depictions of violence, death, and the Holocaust make it impossible not to forget Teddy Daniel's struggle.

    The cast features a nice mix of stars and character actors. Leonardo DiCaprio, his wrinkled brow, and tough accent joined for an excellent depiction of Teddy Daniels, except he looks about ten years too young to be playing a hardened detective and war veteran.  DiCaprio shines during an interrogation scene which rattles the mind of not only the patient in the asylum, but of the audience as well.  Mark Ruffalo can always be counted on to deliver as the trusty sidekick with a hard exterior and a loyal heart.  Ben Kingsley (who also played a psychiatrist in The Wackness) gets the job done  as the untrustworthy Dr. Cawley, but is a little over-the-top when it comes to his sketchiness. Also, if Jack Earle Haley (who plays Rorschach in Watchmen and a creepy pedophile in Little Children) were to play a crazy person in every movie until he dies, that would be perfectly fine. No role was so perfectly fit for an actor in Shutter Island as Jack Earle Haley's depiction of asylum patient George Noyse.  The rest of the cast plays minimal roles, as the subservient nurses and orderlies are almost indistinguishable in their attire and the prison guards with faces like bulldogs were almost like mannequins in a store for crazy people. They looked the same and acted like they were all hooked up to some kind of brain that ran the hospital. Scorsese is usually a master at using characters to tell the story, but in Shutter Islandthe characters are just pawns of the story and lack the significance they have in his past films.

    What Shutter Island ultimately comes down to is how one perceives the ending. It is possible to leave the theater angry, confused, or ranting that it was brilliant. Whatever the opinion, the film is extremely thought-provoking, and will leave you scouring the IMDB message boards for closure. Take the last one-third of the movie out, and Shutter Island delivers with an intricate plot, suspenseful and exciting build-up, solid acting, and stunning visual artistry. The ending of Shutter Island leaves it up to the viewer to determine if they are truly convinced with what they are handed and how the rest of the film fits in.  As a psychological thriller, it is easy to get caught up in how it ends, but to narrow it down to that would be doing Shutter Island a great injustice.

    Shutter Island is worth the walk along the cliff's edge of sanity, but fails to reach the level of a Scorsese “classic."

    7.5
     


    Comments

    Andrew
    02/19/2010 2:14am

    Comment.... works. Looks like a good flick.

    Reply
    John
    02/19/2010 8:59am

    Great review, but why didn't you guys review Dear John?

    Reply
    Michele
    02/19/2010 9:31am

    Nice review Riley. If I was into psychological thrillers I would go see it. hah

    Reply
    Dustin Piercy
    02/19/2010 11:16pm

    Unusually poor filmography, editing, and makeup for such a big-budget film. Well-acted and scripted.
    5.5/10

    Reply
    Nick
    02/22/2010 4:51pm

    Thanks for the review mayne...I'll likely see it this Thursday and hope it doesn't have a Mulholland Drive type ending

    Reply
    Chet
    02/25/2010 10:32am

    What a tremendous disappointment. I’m a fan of both Scorsese and DiCaprio and frankly expected much better. The plot was very predictable as well. Not the first A list actor and director to lay an egg, won’t be the last. Nice review, but a bit too gracious imo.

    Reply
    Emanuel link
    02/26/2010 9:34pm

    Chet & Dustin,

    As soon as the credits started rolling I was definitely disappointed. The more and more I thought about it, I realized that Martin Scorsese had just told me a complete story, that seemingly had a beginning, climax, and conclusion; yet I had no clue whatsoever what had ACTUALLY occurred.

    (Spoiler Alert)

    Was he crazy? Or did he just give up in the end, realizing that he'd lost to the leviathan government? As I discussed the film with my buddies, for every piece of evidence toward his being "criminally insane," somebody brought up another scene in the movie that contradicted that, leaving viewers with the possibility that he was a victim of this great ploy they've are watching the entire time.

    Have you seen one of those crazy "infinity" pictures online, like of somebody taking a picture of a mirror and it just goes on and on forever? THAT IS SHUTTER ISLAND in film form. There is no right answer. There is no definitive conclusion. NOBODY knows what actually happened, except the characters on the island.

    Because Scorsese (and Laeta Kalogridis' adaptation of the Dennis Lehane novel) was able to somehow adapt this crazy story into a film that tricks its own audience into a sense of closure, his work on it is incredible.

    This might be me pretentiously over-analyzing the film, and being a Scorsese homer, but to that I give two defenses:

    1) in regards to me being a Scorsese fanboy: the NY Times' film critic, A.O. Scott arrogantly mentioned in his S.I. review that anyone who liked the film, only liked it because Scorsese directed it. But, I feel the opposite. I add heavy expectations to a film based on the involvement of a certain actor or director. Typically I am over-critical of my favorite entertainers because they can't match up to the ideal I've created in my head. (there's no way P.T. Anderson bests There Will Be Blood) I feel as though if this exact same cut had some lesser known director's name on it, we would all be applauding it as an achievement.

    2) in regards to the analysis: as I write this, almost 2 weeks after screening the film, I'm still perplexed at the trick that was played on me. I have no clue what actually occurred, and either does anyone else. And the way that the movie continues to resonate in our minds through questions and curiosities is something that rarely occurs in mainstream movies.

    Everyone is definitely entitled to their opinions (some people actually went and saw "Old Dogs")but I think this is a proper response to the take that this positive review might be a little gracious.

    Thanks for reading notthebees and please keep commenting, we all love hearing from people and talking about movies.

    -Emanuel & the Bees

    Reply
    Megan
    02/28/2010 5:27pm

    Enjoyed your review. I think DiCaprio was perfect for the part and actually really loved the idea of not knowing what really happened in the end. I gave it a 10/10 and I'm not even a fan of Scorsese.

    Reply



    Leave a Reply

      Picture

      RSS Feed


      Past Reviews:
      (ranked by rating)


      Black Swan 10/10
      The Social Network 9/10
      Inception 9/10
      The Ghost Writer 8/10
      The Town 7.5/10
      I'm Still Here 7.5/10
      Piranha 3D 7.5/10
      Kick-Ass 7.5/10
      Shutter Island 7.5/10
      The Last Airbender 7/10
      The Crazies 7/10
      The Fighter 6.5/10
      Cyrus 6.5/10
      The A-Team 6.5/10
      MacGruber 6.5/10
      The Mechanic 6/10
      Due Date 6/10
      Catfish 6/10
      Machete 6/10
      The Twilight Saga: Eclipse 6/10
      Get Him to the Greek 6/10
      The Wolfman 6/10
      Edge of Darkness 6/10
      The Other Guys 5.5/10
      A Nightmare on Elm St. 5.5/10
      Paul 5/10
      Brooklyn's Finest 5/10
      Cop Out 4.5/10
      From Paris With Love 3/10



    Create a free website with Weebly